News & Press

FLSmidth engages in active communication with the company's stakeholders.

Men on cement plant site

Company Announcements

FLSmidth is continuously negotiating many potential contracts. To be considered binding, such contracts require not only signing but also exchange of down payment and guarantees.

FLSmidth acquitted of having violated the principle of disclosure of information under the Securities Trading Act


Company Announcement to the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority No. 29-2010, 27 October 2010

The Frederiksberg District Court has today ruled in favour of FLSmidth & Co. A/S with regard to its disclosure procedures for new orders according to Section 27, subsection 1 of the Danish Securities Trading Act. 


The case concerns the release of a stock exchange message in November 2007 when 20 hours passed from a journalist asked FLSmidth & Co. A/S to verify rumours of a contract in Russia until FLSmidth & Co. A/S issued a stock exchange message regarding the same contract before the Stock Exchange opened for trading on 7 November 2007.


Since the Financial Supervisory Authority reported the case to the prosecutor in 2007, it has been modified in that the prosecution has decided to widen the scope by maintaining that the conditional contract should have been disclosed publically already at the time of signature, in other words long before the journalist heard rumours of the contract.


FLSmidth is continuously awarded contracts that in most cases are subject to very significant conditions concerning, for example, the submission by FLSmidth of bank guarantees to the customer and the receipt by FLSmidth of prepayment from the customer. Since for various reasons a not insignificant portion of such conditional orders never materialises, the FLSmidth & Co. A/S Board and Management has for many years adopted the practice, which it has announced and had approved by the Copenhagen Stock Exchange in 2005, not to recognise, start working on nor publically disclose such orders until the contract has become effective, ie. when the above-mentioned conditions of the contract have been fulfilled. By doing so, FLSmidth & Co. A/S wishes to ensure that the information disclosed to the stock market regarding new orders and order backlog is timely and reliable and that the orders announced by the company are in accordance with those booked.


With its judgment today, the Frederiksberg District Court has dismissed the prosecution's claim and established that the practice adopted by FLSmidth & Co. A/S not to publically disclose an order until the significant conditions of the contract have been fulfilled does not conflict with Section 27, subsection 1 of the Danish Securities Trading Act.


The Frederiksberg District Court, however, found that FLSmidth & Co. A/S should have announced the contract immediately after being contacted by a journalist who had picked up rumours of the new contract regardless of the special circumstances that led to FLSmidth & Co. A/S postponing the announcement and it imposed a fine on FLSmidth & Co. A/S amounting to DKK 50,000.

As a consequence of the incident, FLSmidth & Co. A/S already in 2007 took further steps towards ensuring that FLSmidth & Co. A/S always provides its shareholders with reliable and timely information.





Please address any questions regarding this announcement to Head of Corporate Communications & Investor Relations Pernille Friis Andersen, FLSmidth & Co. A/S at +4536181800.


For further information about FLSmidth, please visit



Yours faithfully

Pernille Friis Andersen
Corporate Communications & Investor Relations